I was happily reading "The Cat in the Hat" to Sophie this evening when I noticed that she was leaning forward, staring at the pages, breathing quickly, and wringing her hands.
The story is just that gripping.
I stopped and asked her if it was scary. I asked if I should stop.
She told me that yes, it was scary, and no I shouldn't stop.
I asked her what was scary.
To my surprise, the scary bit was not the actual Cat in the Hat, himself, but rather Thing One and Thing Two. Also scary was the fact that Mother was coming up to the door and she was about to come in and discover the mess and be angry. The fish was also scary. Or maybe the fish's distress was scary.
(This makes a lot of sense once you realize that the book is actually a Freudian allegory. This is a new book for us, and I've been thinking about this since Christmas. Originally I thought that the Cat in the Hat was the Id, but once Sophie told me how scary Thing One and Thing Two were I immediately recognized that I had been wrong. It is Thing One and Thing Two who are the Id: shut up in their box, animalistic, uncontrollable, fun and yet frightening, and subverting the conventions of rational expectation in their very multiplicity. Also compelling: the German original of the Latinized "Id" is "das Es" [="the It"]. The fish is clearly a representative of the superego. The Cat in the Hat, then, is the childish personality: as yet undeveloped, clearly narcissistic in his grandiosity, a stand-in, or Doppelgänger for the children's unlawful desires. Considered as a dream-space, as the expression of one psyche, the book illustrates the acting out of illicit, but [thanks to the projection of the Cat in the Hat] disavowable desire. This is a therapeutic process in which the immature psyche can work out the distinctions and roles necessary for adult life. The book as a whole functions as an exploded view of one psyche, whose narrative arc first releases and then gathers up again the ill-defined and explosive desire that chafes against the strain of being "good". The final deus-ex-machina of the Cat's machine returns us to the tidy and contained condition from which the book starts. [Why Sally and her brother? Proto-gender roles that are, as yet, still fluid. Remember there exist Things One and Two—one for each "sibling" perhaps].)